By Deborah Muns-Park
It's a common situation for appellate lawyers: The trial court wrongly decided the case because it relied upon clearly erroneous, but controlling, precedent. It's time to argue to the appellate court that the controlling precedent should be disregarded or overruled, right?
&nb...
It's a common situation for appellate lawyers: The trial court wrongly decided the case because it relied upon clearly erroneous, but controlling, precedent. It's time to argue to the appellate court that the controlling precedent should be disregarded or overruled, right?
&nb...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In



