This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Criminal,
Government

Dec. 25, 2001

Washout Question

Voter-approved initiatives often are tied up in the courts for years before anyone can make any sense of them. Proposition 36, the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act approved last year, may prove to be no different in this regard.

Stanley Mosk Courthouse

Alex Ricciardulli

Judge
Los Angeles County Superior Court

Appellate

UC Berkeley School of Law, 1987

See more...

Voter-approved initiatives often are tied up in the courts for years before anyone can make any sense of them. Proposition 36, the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act approved last year, may prove to be no different in this regard.

In 1982, Proposition 8, "The Victims' Bill of Rights" initiative, greatly limited the ability to suppress evidence due to unreasonable searches and seizures. Well over 1000 appellate opinions have tried to figure out what it really meant.

...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up