This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Insurance

Mar. 21, 2009

A Genuine Pullback

Recent decisions pulling back on the genuine dispute doctrine are an apparent response to insurers' over-utilization of this doctrine.

The "genuine dispute" doctrine has long been a favorite of insurers. A couple of years ago, though, the proverbial pendulum started to swing back so that, at least in the foreseeable future, this doctrine will likely have less of an impact on the resolution of bad faith litigation. This negative impact on defendant insurers is similar, in many respects, to the recent trend restricting many awards of punitive damages, thus bothering policyholders and other plaintiffs.

Earlier this...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails