This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Appellate Practice,
California Courts of Appeal

Nov. 13, 1999

So Long, Goodbye

One would think that a lawyer who abandons his client in a pending case and fails to withdraw properly as counsel of record would later be estopped from arguing that his duty to represent his client ceased. Surprisingly, several California appellate courts have held just the opposite.

One would think that a lawyer who abandons his client in a pending case and fails to withdraw properly as counsel of record would later be estopped from arguing that his duty to represent his client ceased. Surprisingly, several California appellate courts have held just the opposite.

The statute of limitations for legal malpractice is one year from the date the client discovers, or should have discovered, the facts constituting his attorney's wrongful act or omission. However, t...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails