George Bernard Shaw wryly observed that "Science never solves a problem without creating ten more" - an observation made clearly evident in a judge's role in examining scientific testimony in court. Rare indeed is the trial without scientific evidence, and rarer still is the scientific theory without controversy - a problematic development when it comes to admission of scientific evidence in court.
The objective of this article and self-study test is to familiarize readers with re...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In