Sep. 26, 2018
Justices will weigh takings law state court exhaustion requirement
On Oct. 3, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a case that could overturn precedent that has long been criticized as creating a procedural Catch-22 that impairs the ability of property owners to protect their constitutional rights in federal court.
Bryan W. Wenter
Shareholder
Miller Starr Regalia
Email: bryan.wenter@msrlegal.com
Bryan is a member of the firm's Land Use Department. His practice centers on land use and local government law, with a particular focus on obtaining and defending land use entitlements for a wide range of development projects, including in-fill, mixed-use, residential, retail/commercial, and industrial.
OT18
On Oct. 3, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Knick v. Township of Scott (17-647). The court's decision could overturn Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank, 473 U.S. 172 (1985), a case that has long been criticized as creating a procedural Catch-22 that impairs the ability of property owners to protect their constitutional rights in federal c...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In