This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

Law Practice

Apr. 6, 2021

California: From a mining state to a farming state

In 1884, the economy of California abruptly changed its prime focus from extraction, specifically gold mining, to agriculture. How did this happen? The farmers won a lawsuit.

Donald E. Warner

Donald is a Los Angeles-based lawyer and adjunct professor at Loyola Law School, Los Angeles, where his courses have included California Legal History.

See more...

In 1884, the economy of California abruptly changed its prime focus from extraction, specifically gold mining, to agriculture. How did this happen? The farmers won a lawsuit.

On Jan. 7, 1884, Judge Lorenzo Sawyer of the Federal Circuit Court (the precursor to today's 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals) issued the court's opinion in Woodruff v. North Bloomfield Gravel Mining. That, all by itself, was the sole basis for the change...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up