This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Class Action,
Intellectual Property,
Technology

Jul. 13, 2023

Comedian files class action against OpenAI for alleged copyright infringement

Comedian Sarah Silverman has filed a class action lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging copyright infringement of her written work. The defendant, OpenAI, is expected to base their defense on the Fair Use doctrine and other non-infringement theories. They may argue that an AI language model training on various texts is no different than a person reading others’ work to inspire their own style, which is completely permitted. Moreover, any individual work would constitute a tiny fraction of the total training data. Furthermore, it can be argued that the model does not reproduce entire works verbatim.

Josh Eichenstein

Founder
Eichenstein Law Firm P.C.

Email: Joshua@EichIPLaw.com

Southwestern Univ SOL; Los Angeles CA

Josh is a Los Angeles-based intellectual property attorney specializing in copyright, trademark, patent, and trade secret litigation. He was rated as one of Super Lawyers' Rising Stars in the field of Intellectual Property Litigation for the Southern California region from 2017 to 2023.

See more...

It was only a matter of time for Open AI to be sued for copyright infringement and it finally happened. One of the most successful comedians of all time, Sarah Silverman, along with others, initiated a class-action copyright infringement lawsuit against OpenAI, Inc. and its associated entities. The crux of their argument? They claim that OpenAI’s language model, ChatGPT, was unlawfully exploiting their copyrighted works, including their own books, without their permis...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up