This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Intellectual Property,
Labor/Employment

Jan. 18, 2024

Judge: Trader Joe’s trade mark claims close to frivolous

The Trader Joe’s complaint was filed amid union organizing across the country, noted U.S. District Judge Hernan D. Vera. The company said it was concerned that the union selling Trader Joe’s branded items would confuse customers.

A federal judge in Los Angeles referred to a Trader Joe’s trademark complaint about merchandise sold by its employee union as “dangerously” close to being frivolous and dismissed it on grounds that it did not meet a consumer confusion condition in the Lanham Act.

The Trader Joe’s complaint also sought injunctive relief, which U.S. District Judge Hernan D. Vera denied under the Norris-LaGuardia Act — which bars courts from issuing business ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up