This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Jan. 31, 2024

Warrants are the only judicial key to opening a safe deposit box

A Ninth Circuit panel vindicated plaintiffs’ Fourth Amendment claims, reversing a district court’s judgment in favor of the government.

Dmitry Gorin

Partner, Eisner Gorin LLP

Alan Eisner

Partner, Eisner Gorin LLP

Robert Hill

Associate, Eisner Gorin LLP

A unanimous panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district court’s judgment that the government did not violate the Fourth Amendment when it conducted warrantless “inventory searches” of safe deposit boxes owned by multiple individuals at a Beverly Hills facility. The panel remanded the case with instructions to order the destruction of any records related to the search of the plaintiffs’ property, the only remedy remaining to the plaintiffs after the...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$887 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?