9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Jan. 31, 2024
Warrants are the only judicial key to opening a safe deposit box
A Ninth Circuit panel vindicated plaintiffs’ Fourth Amendment claims, reversing a district court’s judgment in favor of the government.
![](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/dailyjournal-prod/linkedin.png)
![](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/dailyjournal-prod/twitter.png)
![](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/dailyjournal-prod/threads.png)
![](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/dailyjournal-prod/facebook.png)
![](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/dailyjournal-prod/people/avatars/000/218/661/original/gorin_dmitry_web.jpg?1607464016)
Dmitry Gorin
Partner, Eisner Gorin LLP
![](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/dailyjournal-prod/people/avatars/000/218/662/original/eisner_alan_web.jpg?1607463840)
Alan Eisner
Partner, Eisner Gorin LLP
![](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/dailyjournal-prod/people/avatars/000/218/682/original/hill_robert_web.jpg?1607640249)
Robert Hill
Associate, Eisner Gorin LLP
A unanimous panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district court’s judgment that the government did not violate the Fourth Amendment when it conducted warrantless “inventory searches” of safe deposit boxes owned by multiple individuals at a Beverly Hills facility. The panel remanded the case with instructions to order the destruction of any records related to the search of the plaintiffs’ property, the only remedy remaining to the plaintiffs after the...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$887 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In