This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Alternative Dispute Resolution,
Law Practice

Jun. 28, 2024

Quantum meruit: As much as one has deserved

California does not have a system to arbitrate fee disputes among lawyers who have worked on the same case under different fee agreements. Therefore, the successor counsel should pay the predecessor counsel the quantum meruit amount based on the same principles that apply to fee disputes between lawyers and clients.

Shutterstock

Fee agreements often offer a final resolution of a significant issue for an engagement, how much a lawyer should be paid for their advice and services. But there are circumstances when the arc of the lawyer-client relationship goes off script and the appropriate fee is measured instead by quantum meruit, the amount earned or as much as one has deserved.

This can often happen when a client substitutes one counsel in for another in a conting...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails