This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Criminal,
Government

Aug. 26, 2024

Debate over Prop 47 and homelessness rekindled by Prop 36

Homelessness in California went up in the decade since voters passed criminal law changes, counter to what happened elsewhere in the U.S. Critics and proponents of a new ballot measure are split on whether Proposition 47 is to blame.

Photo courtesy of Yolo County District Attorney Jeff Reisig's office.

Critics of Proposition 47 have long claimed that it increased homelessness by removing incentives for people to receive addiction treatment instead of jail sentences. The claim has now become a key talking point for the Proposition 36 campaign.

The rhetoric around the initiative to scale back portions of the 2014 criminal justice law changes has revived an old debate: Is homelessness mainly driven by addiction and mental illness, or by economics?

Yolo County District Atto...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails