This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Civil Litigation

Aug. 30, 2024

Explaining the law in closing argument

Effectively targeting key instructions and discussing them with the jury during your closing argument can significantly influence the outcome of your case.

Shutterstock

While there are some bright line rules for closing argument - the Golden Rule, offering personal opinions, referencing evidence not presented during trial - it is abundantly clear that a trial court must not restrict a lawyer's ability to interpret and argue the law. The latitude given to a lawyer in arguing the law is so "wide" as to be "unabridged." See Cassim v. Allstate Ins. Co. (2004) 33 Cal.4th 780, 795; see also Neumann v. Bishop (1976) 59 Cal. App. 3d 451, 4...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails