This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Ralph O. Williams III

By Pat Broderick | Oct. 17, 2013

Oct. 17, 2013

Ralph O. Williams III

See more on Ralph O. Williams III

ADR Services Inc. Los Angeles Specialties: insurance, business litigation, real estate, employment, legal/accounting malpractice


Attachments



Some lawyers represent clients who are victims of scams. But there are times when they themselves get snookered.


Consider one of Williams' recent mediations:


A lawyer responded to an email from what he thought was a potential client who wanted to hire him for a six-figure collection matter.


The purported client e-signs an hourly engagement agreement, and the lawyer writes a demand letter to the potential defendant, who agrees to pay up.


The lawyer collects the debtor's check and deposits it in his trust account. After conferring with a bank clerk who mistakenly tells him that the check has cleared, the lawyer then wires the funds offshore, less his fees.


"That's where the wheels came off the wagon," Williams said.


The check bounces and the lawyer is sued by his bank for overdrawing his trust account.


"The lawyer's malpractice insurance carrier reserves rights, because the trust account administration, vis-a-vis the bank, is not considered to be rendering professional services for others," Williams explained.


This was a classic Internet Nigerian check scam, he said, adding, "Seasoned lawyers have fallen for it. Most lawyers do not understand banking law very well, unless they are specialists. They don't know that they are responsible. The bank is not in the fraud-prevention business."


The case is still being mediated, but Williams said that he is confident it will settle.


"When similar cases go to verdict, the bank has the advantage," he said. "Most settle. Usually the lawyer's malpractice carrier picks up a part of the settlement."


It just makes good business sense, Williams said, adding, "These cases cost a fortune to defend. It's in the interest of the bank to recover the money, the lawyer to get rid of the obligation, and the insurance company to close the lawsuit. If everybody takes a bit of a haircut and is sensible, the case can resolve."

- Pat Broderick

<!-- Ralph O. Williams III -->

#253048

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390

Send a letter to the editor:

Email: letters@dailyjournal.com