This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Geoff Howard

By Pat Broderick | Sep. 22, 2011

Sep. 22, 2011

Geoff Howard

See more on Geoff Howard

Bingham McCutchen LLP

San Francisco

Practice: litigation

Specialty: intellectual property


Serving as team leader and co-lead counsel on a case heralded as one of the nation's largest intellectual property cases ever litigated consumed most of Howard's time for the past 18 months.


On Nov. 23, 2010, he and his team won a landmark victory for the Oracle Corp., resulting in a jury award of $1.3 billion in damages for software piracy. Oracle Corp. v. SAP AG, 3:07-CV-01658, (N.D. Cal.).


Oracle filed its lawsuit in 2007, alleging that SAP had stolen thousands of copies of the company's software and resold them and related services to Oracle's own customers.


"It was an incredible experience," Howard said. "We had the best and most talented team I've ever been a part of."


But Oracle received a setback on Sept. 1, when a federal judge tossed out the award, ruling Oracle could accept a $272 million award, labeling it "the maximum amount of lost profits and infringer's profits sustainable by the proof."


In a prepared statement, Oracle wrote, "There was voluminous evidence regarding the massive scope of the theft, clear involvement of SAP management in the misconduct and the tremendous value of the IP stolen. We believe the jury got it right and we intend to pursue the full measure of damages that we believe are owed to Oracle."


Trying a case of this magnitude, along with conveying to a jury all of the highly complex technical evidence, he said, "was an enormous challenge."


"If you allow yourself to get too far into the weeds, you can lose a jury," Howard said. "But at the heart this was a simple story - 'This is our stuff, it is extremely valuable, we paid for it, and you took it.'"


Howard also credits what he called "a very attentive jury," adding, "We live in an era when people have a certain amount of technical background and skills. It's not as if the concepts are completely foreign to them."

- PAT BRODERICK

#275861

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390

Send a letter to the editor:

Email: letters@dailyjournal.com