This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
News

Administrative/Regulatory

Feb. 17, 2016

SEC internal investigation finds no evidence of bias by administrative law judges

An investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission's Office of the Inspector General has cleared commission-appointed administrative law judges of showing bias in favor of the SEC in adversarial proceedings against SEC targets.

By Tim O'Connor
Daily Journal Staff Writer

An investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission's Office of the Inspector General has cleared commission-appointed administrative law judges of showing bias in favor of the SEC in adversarial proceedings against SEC targets.

"The OIG did not develop any evidence to support the allegations of improper influence," Inspector General Carl W. Hoecker wrote in a memo to SEC Chair Mary Jo White. It was attached to the 26-page report on the investigation released last week. "Also, former and current Office of ALJ staff stated that ALJ decisions were made independently and free from influence of Chief ALJ Brenda Murray."

The investigation was triggered by accusations in May 2015 newspaper reports by now-former Administrative Law Judge Lillian McEwen that Murray chastised her about decisions in favor of defendants and questioned her loyalty to the SEC.

"With the exception of McEwen's allegations, the OIG investigation found that the criticisms Murray had of ALJs were not related to the substance of their decisions when presiding over cases, but rather to the timeliness in which they issued their decisions and/or the procedural quality of their work," the report said. "Furthermore, the OIG investigation identified only possible reference to loyalty by Murray, but the reported emphasis was loyalty to the quality of the ALJ process and not loyalty to the SEC Division of Enforcement."

The findings are unlikely to dampen criticism of the SEC's administrative law proceedings.

"I don't think the IG's report is going to move the needle one way or the other," said Thomas Zaccaro, a former SEC trial counsel and a founding partner of the boutique firm Zaccaro Morgan LLP. He said the rules of the proceedings that favor the SEC are the real culprit. "It's not going to change the perception the ALJ proceedings themselves are biased in favor of the SEC."

That criticism has swelled as the SEC has turned to administrative law judge hearings more and more to litigate accusations of financial regulatory violations by companies and individuals since the passage of the Dodd-Frank Act in 2010. That law gave the commission more power to impose penalties and sanctions in administrative proceedings.

tim_oconnor@dailyjournal.com

#314488

Tim O'connor

Daily Journal Staff Writer

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424

Send a letter to the editor:

Email: letters@dailyjournal.com