This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Sep. 10, 2014

Elizabeth Pipkin

See more on Elizabeth Pipkin

McManis Faulkner | San Jose | Practice Type: Litigation | Specialties: civil rights and commercial disputes


For eight years, trial attorney Pipkin worked to clear her client's name off the no-fly list, a difficult task under the post-9/11 tactic to stop individuals with alleged terrorist ties from using U.S. air travel.


Dr. Rahinah Ibrahim was finishing a doctorate at Stanford when she was handcuffed and jailed at the San Francisco airport for being on the no-fly list. When she flew back to Malaysia, Ibrahim's visa was revoked.


Though an ocean divided her from her client, Pipkin finally received a ruling from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals last January that Ibrahim will be removed from the no-fly list after two dismissals in a lower court. Ibrahim v. Department of Homeland Security et al. (N.D. Cal., filed Jan. 27, 2006).


"That case was a historic case and continues to be a historic case," she said. "The firm took on this case because it was the right thing to do."


It's considered the first successful case in forcing the government to share why it put someone's name on the list. Pipkin learned in discovery that the government wanted to conceal an FBI agent's mistake of checking the wrong box by Ibrahim's name.


The Ibrahim case varies from Pipkin's usual caseload, where she deals with companies and individuals accused of stealing trade secrets and straying from contracts in the heart of Silicon Valley. Last year, Pipkin worked with defendant Juniper Networks, a networking equipment manufacturer, in a case where rival Alcatel-Lucent alleged Juniper's recent purchase of a startup would affect its company to the tune of a $65 million loss it wanted Juniper to pay. Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc. v. Juniper Networks 1-11-CV-206910 (Santa Clara County Sup. Ct., filed August 9, 2011).


At first, the jury ruled in favor of Alcatel with a fraction of the damages, but Pipkin found enough evidence for the court to rule in her client's favor in a judgment notwithstanding the verdict motion with Juniper not having to pay anything. Alcatel filed an appeal in July.


A daughter of a wheat farmer and a speech teacher, Pipkin said she learned how to deal with business matters and add her voice to them at a young age.


"I learned how to analyze a problem and how to work through a difficult issue and how to deal with injury," she said of working on the farm in a Texan town with a population of 3,000.


Pipkin now represents SK Hynix, Inc. in a case against SanDisk, which is accusing her client of giving up information on its flash memory technology. SanDisk v. SK Hynix, Inc. (Santa Clara County Sup. Ct., filed March 13, 2014).

<< KIBKABE ARAYA

#340047

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390

Send a letter to the editor:

Email: letters@dailyjournal.com