This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
News

Bankruptcy

Jul. 19, 2019

US trustee files objection to PG&E incentive plan for executives

Trustee Andrew R. Vara claims PG&E hasn’t sufficiently proved how it’s measuring executives’ performances to warrant massive financial bonuses.

A U.S. trustee has filed an objection to a motion to approve a multimillion dollar employee incentive plan filed by Pacific Gas and Electric Corp. in bankruptcy court.

Acting trustee Andrew R. Vara's objection, filed Wednesday through his counsel, attempts to block approval of PG&E's key employee incentive plan, known as KEIP. The plan could award up to $16.3 million in bonuses to PG&E's senior staff members, including the executive vice president of law, strategy and policy, the general counsel, deputy general counsel and chief financial officer.

That sum is more than 275% of the base salaries of those executives, according to the objection.

The objection states PG&E has not provided any information to the court about how the KEIP is measured, noting the only reference to the metrics are that they are similar to a separate short-term incentive plan approved earlier this year. Vara argued that's not enough to evaluate the executives' performance. In re PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company, 19-30088. (Bankr. N.D. Cal., filed Jan. 29, 2019).

PG&E argued its KEIP, by nature as an incentive plan, is exempt from bankruptcy statute 503(c)(1), which requires a debtor to prove the recipients of the incentives are not insiders of the company or, if they are, that the payments are not intended to retain those people, according to court documents. Vara's objection questions whether the KEIP is an incentive plan instead of a retention plan.

"The debtors bear the burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that the KEIP is primarily incentivizing, rather than primarily retentive," the objection said. "In other words, the debtors must demonstrate that the KEIP is not retention-based."

PG&E spokesperson Ari Vanrenen did not comment specifically about Vara's objection, but said in a statement, "PG&E's proposed CEO compensation plan aligns incentive compensation with our goals, including, most significantly, those relating to safe operations of our electric and gas systems."

Vara is the trustee for Region 3, which includes Delaware, New Jersey And Pennsylvania. Southern California's trustee, Tracy Hope Davis, recused herself from the case, according to the objection.

The U.S. attorneys representing Vara in the case declined to comment Wednesday.

-- Nicole Tyau

#353566

Nicole Tyau

Daily Journal Staff Writer
nicole_tyau@dailyjournal.com

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424

Send a letter to the editor:

Email: letters@dailyjournal.com