Criminal,
Letters
Aug. 28, 2019
Tort policy isn’t the problem
The idea that the “expansion” of qualified immunity for peace officers in civil rights cases, including those involving the use of force, can only encourage law enforcement to shoot first and ask questions later,” is simply fanciful.
Gary Schons
Of Counsel, Best Best & Krieger LLP
Public Law
655 W Broadway Ste 1500
San Diego , CA 92101
Phone: (619) 525-1348
Fax: (619) 233-6118
Email: gary.schons@bbklaw.com
U San Diego School of Law
The idea that the "expansion" of qualified immunity for peace officers in civil rights cases, including those involving the use of force, can only encourage law enforcement to shoot first and ask questions later," is simply fanciful. ["The qualified immunity dilemma," Aug. 27, 2019]. The notion that peace officers, confronted with deadly situations in the field, deadly both as to them and the citizens they are charged to protect, calculate their tort liability before deploying force ignores reality. That peace officer is thinking about one thing, and one thing only, going home in one piece. Much can be done in training, standards and practices to de-escalate the violence, but blaming tort policy is hardly the answer.
-- Gary Schons
Of Counsel
Best Best & Krieger
Submit your own column for publication to Diana Bosetti
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390
Send a letter to the editor:
Email: letters@dailyjournal.com