This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Criminal,
Letters

Aug. 28, 2019

Tort policy isn’t the problem

The idea that the “expansion” of qualified immunity for peace officers in civil rights cases, including those involving the use of force, can only encourage law enforcement to shoot first and ask questions later,” is simply fanciful.

Gary Schons

Of Counsel, Best Best & Krieger LLP

Public Law

655 W Broadway Ste 1500
San Diego , CA 92101

Phone: (619) 525-1348

Fax: (619) 233-6118

Email: gary.schons@bbklaw.com

U San Diego School of Law

The idea that the "expansion" of qualified immunity for peace officers in civil rights cases, including those involving the use of force, can only encourage law enforcement to shoot first and ask questions later," is simply fanciful. ["The qualified immunity dilemma," Aug. 27, 2019]. The notion that peace officers, confronted with deadly situations in the field, deadly both as to them and the citizens they are charged to protect, calculate their tort liability before deploying force ignores reality. That peace officer is thinking about one thing, and one thing only, going home in one piece. Much can be done in training, standards and practices to de-escalate the violence, but blaming tort policy is hardly the answer.

-- Gary Schons

Of Counsel

Best Best & Krieger

#354066


Submit your own column for publication to Diana Bosetti


For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390

Send a letter to the editor:

Email: letters@dailyjournal.com