This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
News

Criminal,
Immigration

Mar. 10, 2020

US judge blocks Sacramento TV station from getting immigration files in criminal case

KXTV, a Sacramento ABC affiliate, filed a Freedom of Information Act request for “all immigration files, photos, annotations and investigations compiled” on Omar Ameen, an Iraqi who is facing terrorism charges and deportation in federal court.

A federal judge in Sacramento has rejected a television station's bid to gain the immigration files of a man facing terrorism charges.

KXTV, a Sacramento ABC affiliate, filed a Freedom of Information Act request for "all immigration files, photos, annotations and investigations compiled" on Omar Ameen. However, U.S. District Judge John A. Mendez ruled Friday the records fell under exemptions in the act. KXTV LLC dba ABC10 v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, 2:19-cv-00415-JAM-CKD (E.D. Cal., filed March 7, 2019).

Ameen is an Iraqi who was arrested in 2018 at his home on suspicion of being a member of the ISIS terrorist network and carrying out a murder in that country. He denies the charges and claims he will be murdered by the Iraqi government if he is extradited back to that country, as federal authorities are seeking to do in USA v. Ameen, 2:18-mj-00152-EFB (E.D. Cal., filed Aug. 14, 2018).

Federal immigration officials had earlier released some of the files the station sought but withheld others under exemptions protecting personal information and law enforcement investigations. Through his attorneys, Ameen at one point sought to intervene in the case to block further disclosure of his immigration files, though he later dropped this motion and provided some of the documents from his own records.

This left only three full pages and 26 partially redacted pages the federal government is still seeking to block. In his ruling, Mendez wrote the federal government had given sufficiently detailed reasons why the remaining documents should not be turned over.

"With FOIA's exemptions, 'Congress created a scheme of categorical exclusion; it did not invite a judicial weighing of the benefits and evils of disclosure on a case-by-case basis,'" Mendez wrote, citing FBI v. Abramson, 456 U.S. 615, 631 (1982).

-- Malcolm Maclachlan

#356614

Malcolm Maclachlan

Daily Journal Staff Writer
malcolm_maclachlan@dailyjournal.com

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424

Send a letter to the editor:

Email: letters@dailyjournal.com