This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Law Practice,
Tax

Oct. 23, 2020

Remember, IRS taxes most settlements, exact wording matters

If you are a plaintiff, you should care about taxes, and if you are a plaintiff’s lawyer, you should make sure your client takes time to think about these issues while there is still time to influence them.

Robert W. Wood

Managing Partner, Wood LLP

333 Sacramento St
San Francisco , California 94111-3601

Phone: (415) 834-0113

Fax: (415) 789-4540

Email: wood@WoodLLP.com

Univ of Chicago Law School

Wood is a tax lawyer at Wood LLP, and often advises lawyers and litigants about tax issues.

If you are a plaintiff, you should care about taxes, and if you are a plaintiff's lawyer, you should make sure your client takes time to think about these issues while there is still time to influence them. If you collect a legal settlement, the tax treatment varies depending on how you were damaged, how the case was resolved, how checks and IRS Forms 1099 were issued and more. Whether you settle your case, win a judgment, or even if your dispute only reached the letter-writing phase, taxes apply in most cases.

As you would expect, taxes depend on what the case was about, how the settlement agreement is worded, the complaint, how checks and IRS Forms 1099 are prepared and more. You can influence how your recovery is taxed by how you deal with these issues. Fortunately, if you sue for personal physical injuries like a slip and fall or car accident, compensatory damages should be tax-free even if you were seeking lost wages because you couldn't work after your injuries. Section 104 of the tax code shields compensatory damages for personal physical injuries and physical sickness.

However, to qualify for an exclusion from income, your injury must be "physical," and it's not clear exactly what that means. The tax law draws a distinction between money for physical symptoms of emotional distress (like headaches and stomachaches) and physical injuries or sickness. The issue come up in in many contexts, but one especially common venue is employment cases where plaintiffs claim their employer made their medical condition worse or gave them PTSD.

The tax law is still uncertain on this point, but one can argue that PTSD itself is a physical sickness. An agreement between plaintiff and defendant is not binding on the IRS, but what the parties say in the agreement is often followed in an audit. Thus, it is wise to try to get agreement with the defendant about the tax issues. A key issue is tax reporting. If you don't say anything about taxes in a settlement agreement, you will almost variably receive IRS Form W-2 or Form 1099.

What's more, the tax treatment of legal fees can be particularly alarming. Many plaintiffs and lawyers alike also find it counterintuitive. In most cases, a Form 1099 will say the plaintiff got 100% of the money, even if 40% went directly to the plaintiff's lawyer. The tax rules on attorney fees are complex and difficult. So even if you aren't worried about the net money you receive as a plaintiff, how legal fees are treated is a major tax issue in many cases.

Since 2018 when the tax law changed, many legal fees can no longer be deducted. That means plaintiffs can be taxed on 100% of the settlement verdict, with no tax deduction for their legal fees. The math can be downright bizarre, particularly in cases where there are large punitive damages. Punitive damages are always taxable, even in a physical injury case, and yet the legal fees incurred in collecting punitive damages generally are nondeductible, unless you are creative.

If you are the plaintiff and use a contingent fee lawyer, you'll usually be treated (for tax purposes) as receiving 100% of the money recovered by you and your attorney, even if the defendant pays your lawyer directly their 30% to 40% contingent fee cut. If your case is fully nontaxable (say an auto accident in which you're injured), that won't cause any tax problems. But if your recovery is taxable, watch out. Suppose that you settle a suit for intentional infliction of emotional distress against your neighbor for $100,000, and your lawyer keeps $40,000.

You might think you'd have $60,000 of income. Instead, you'll have $100,000 of income, and you may not be able to deduct the $40,000 in legal fees. Since no client will want to pay tax on money (the lawyer's fees) the client never received, plaintiffs may have to be creative and/or aggressively try to find a ways to deduct legal fees under the new tax law. Advance planning always helps.

Fortunately, if your case involves claims against your employer or for other defined forms of unlawful discrimination, there's an "above the line" deduction for legal fees. But outside of employment or other unlawful discrimination litigation, watch out. There are sometimes ways of circumventing these rules, but you'll need sophisticated tax help before your case settles to do it. Even the math is tricky.

If you are injured in a car crash and get $50,000 in compensatory damages and $5 million in punitive damages, the former is tax-free. The $5 million is fully taxable, and you can have trouble deducting your attorney fees. The same occurs with interest. You might receive a tax-free settlement or judgment, but pre-judgment or post-judgment interest is always taxable (and can produce attorney fee problems).

That can make it attractive to settle your case rather than have it go to judgment. If you're in a car crash and about to receive $50,000 in compensatory (tax-free) damages and $5 million in punitive damages, can you settle for $2 million that is all tax-free? It depends. You'll need professional tax assistance, and the facts and procedural posture of your case are important.

In some cases, though, you can be much better off, from a tax viewpoint, taking less money. It can be tempting to just bring your dispute to an end and to let the tax chips fall where they may. But before you resolve it, consider the tax aspects. You'll almost always have to consider them at tax return time the next year, and you'll be better off considering taxes earlier. 

#360099


Submit your own column for publication to Diana Bosetti


For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390

Send a letter to the editor:

Email: letters@dailyjournal.com