This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Law Practice,
Letters

Jun. 30, 2021

Service of process: Sacrifice in the name of progress

I read with great interest my colleague Judge Michael Stern’s June 29 column, “Service by process by email: A modest 21st century proposal.”

Stanley Mosk Courthouse

Randolph M. Hammock

Judge, Los Angeles County Superior Court

Univeristy of San Diego School of Law

Judge Hammock, currently assigned to an independent calendar court at the Stanley Mosk Courthouse. He is also a member of the Judicial Elections Committee of the California Judges Association, and he played an integral role in the drafting, lobbying and passing of SB 235 into law.

I read with great interest my colleague Judge Michael Stern's June 29 column, "Service of process by email: A modest 21st-century proposal."

When I presided over a civil court, I would consistently cast some skepticism over the current service by publication process. Although I would often grant those requests (and even enter default judgments accordingly), I would opine in open court, that as far as I was aware, the last defendant who read in the newspaper that he was currently being sued, and as such, quickly came to the courthouse to timely file a responsive pleading, was in the 1890s. Suffice it to state, Judge Stern's modest and common-sense suggestion is certainly a step in the right direction.

It has always been my opinion that the current service by publication process has long-ago outlived its goals. I have a suggestion for our legislators on what we could do to perhaps replace this rather archaic publication process. Create a statewide (or even national) database website such as "AreYouBeingSued?. Com." As a last resort to effectuate valid service, the plaintiff/petitioner in a civil, probate or family law matter, must register their case in this website. It must remain registered for at least six months. Any person can access this website via the internet, and merely input their name, and find out if there are any pending actions against them. Hence, any person who has some concerns about being sued (for whatever reasons) could check this website at least every six months to find out whether he or she is, in fact being sued. No default can be entered vis-à-vis this particular process for at least six months after it has been properly registered to this website. I would hope, that this would also be a step in the right direction.

Of course, it is understood that this proposal, if adopted in some form, would result in loss of revenue to the publishers of the current notices, including the Daily Journal. (Sorry about that.) But just like the previous manufactures of buggy-whips, a sacrifice sometimes needs to be made in the cause of progress. 

-- Randolph M. Hammock

Judge, Los Angeles County Superior Court

#363384


Submit your own column for publication to Diana Bosetti


For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390

Send a letter to the editor:

Email: letters@dailyjournal.com