This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
News

Criminal,
Environmental & Energy

Aug. 16, 2021

DOJ won’t file charges against Edison over Woolsey Fire

Penal Code Section 452 would require prosecutors to not only prove that Edison’s equipment caused the fire, but that the company knew its actions presented a substantial and unjustifiable risk, ignored this risk, and that doing so was a gross deviation from what a reasonable utility would have done in the same situation, the state Department of Justice announced.

The California Department of Justice will not file criminal charges against Southern California Edison over the 2018 Woolsey Fire, it announced Friday.

According to a news release from the agency, the fire burned 96,949 acres in Los Angeles and Ventura Counties. It also killed three people, destroyed 1,643 structures and forced nearly 300,000 people to evacuate. The department started an investigation with the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection and the Ventura County Fire Department.

"Based on that investigation, CADOJ has determined that there is insufficient evidence to support a criminal prosecution," the news release stated. "Officials from CADOJ have informed the families of the three individuals who perished in the fire of this decision."

Hueston Hennigan represented SCE in the investigation. "We are grateful that the investigation resulted in the just decision not to pursue criminal charges," said partner Andrew Walsh. "Southern California Edison will continue to focus its efforts on compensating fire victims through the civil process."

The investigation concluded the fire was caused by the company's equipment at up to two points. One was a loose wire, another due to "poor vegetation control near its communication conductor lines." However, the department determined there was "insufficient evidence" to bring charges under the Penal Code.

"Section 452 would require prosecutors to not only prove that Southern California Edison's equipment caused the fire, but also that the company was aware that its actions presented a substantial and unjustifiable risk of causing a fire, that it ignored this risk, and that doing so was a gross deviation from what a reasonable utility would have done in the same situation," the department said.

The company is also defending itself against thousands of civil plaintiffs in Los Angeles Superior County Court. Woolsey Fire cases, JCCP 5000.

#363882

Malcolm Maclachlan

Daily Journal Staff Writer
malcolm_maclachlan@dailyjournal.com

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390

Send a letter to the editor:

Email: letters@dailyjournal.com