This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
News

California Supreme Court,
State Bar & Bar Associations

Sep. 1, 2021

State Supreme Court asks LA Times, State Bar to show cause in Girardi discipline suit

The Times' petition asked the Supreme Court to force the State Bar to release details about investigations into Tom Girardi, and now the court is asking the parties to submit briefs on the court's ability to intervene.

The California Supreme Court issued an order Wednesday to show cause in a Los Angeles Times lawsuit against the State Bar, asking for the release of Thomas V. Girardi's disciplinary records.

The Times petitioned the Supreme Court in July to order the State Bar to release records related to any investigations into Girardi's alleged misconduct. Girardi has been accused of taking client money and using it for personal benefit. The State Bar denied The Times' multiple requests to release the information. Los Angeles Times Communications v. State Bar of California, S269401

The court asked the parties to address three questions: does the court have the authority to reverse the bar's decision, can bar officials disclose confidential information and is the disclosure possible under a confidentiality waiver?

Davis Wright Tremaine partner Kelli Sager, who is representing The Times, argued in the petition that intervention is needed in part because of Girardi's close connections with State Bar officials.

"Given Girardi's long-standing close relationship with State Bar officials, and his prominence in California legal circles, these questions have profound significance for public trust in the state's legal regulatory system," Sager wrote in the petition.

The State Bar's opposition expressed concern over making confidential, internal investigations public and the effect that could have on other attorneys.

"Rather it implicates the broader important public interest rationales behind the confidentiality of State Bar records for all attorneys and witnesses in discipline investigations and, ultimately, the integrity and efficiency of a discipline system whose primary goal is the protection of the public," the State Bar's response stated.

In a statement Wednesday, State Bar spokeswoman Teresa Ruano said if the court determines the records can be released, the bar will comply.

#364077

Nicole Tyau

Daily Journal Staff Writer
nicole_tyau@dailyjournal.com

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424

Send a letter to the editor:

Email: letters@dailyjournal.com