This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
News

9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals,
Criminal,
Data Privacy

Sep. 22, 2021

Panel vacates child porn conviction over privacy rights

Google reported to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children that defendant Luke Wilson had uploaded four images of apparent child pornography to his email account as attachments. But that report did not include the attachments, and no one at Google viewed them.

A 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel vacated a child pornography conviction Tuesday because law enforcement officials never got a search warrant even though the information originally came from Google.

The case drew amicus briefs from several privacy rights groups which argued that the conviction threatened privacy rights. Alphabet Inc.-owned Google, along with Facebook Inc., denied the conviction violated the Fourth Amendment in another amicus brief.

Google reported to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children that defendant Luke Wilson had uploaded four images of apparent child pornography to his email account as attachments. But that report did not include the attachments, and no one at Google viewed them. Instead, the center forwarded the information to the San Diego Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force, where an officer viewed the attachment without a warrant.

Prosecutors argued that the government didn't need a warrant under the private search exception, but 9th Circuit Judge Marsha S. Berzon, an appointee of President Bill Clinton writing for the panel, disagreed.

The first person who saw the images in the email attachments and identified them as child pornography was a federal agent, who did not get a search warrant before doing so, the judge wrote.

"Because the government saw more from its search than the private party had seen, it exceeded the scope of the private search," Berzon wrote. U.S. v. Wilson, 2021 DJDAR 9834 (9th Cir., filed Dec. 21, 2018).

Devin J. Burstein, who represented Wilson on appeal, hailed the ruling and the amicus briefs filed by the ACLU, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and the Electronic Privacy Information Center.

"The 9th Circuit took a big step toward ensuring that individuals continue to have robust Fourth Amendment protection in the digital age," Burstein wrote in an email. "The opinion is clear, comprehensive, and compelling."

Kelly Thornton, a spokeswoman for the U.S. attorney's office in San Diego, declined to comment on the ruling or whether the government would seek en banc review.

"The private search exception allows agents to review information discovered by a third-party private actor to the same extent the private actor reviewed it," Assistant U.S. Attorney Peter G. Ko wrote in court papers defending the verdict.

Wilson had been sentenced to 11 years in prison. The appellate panel reversed U.S. District Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel of San Diego.

#364382

Craig Anderson

Daily Journal Staff Writer
craig_anderson@dailyjournal.com

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390

Send a letter to the editor:

Email: letters@dailyjournal.com