This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
News

Constitutional Law,
Consumer Law,
Government

Jan. 4, 2022

California lawmakers prepare to introduce gun bill modeled on Texas abortion law

Assemblymembers Phil Ting, D-San Francisco, Chris Ward, D-San Diego, and Mike A. Gipson, D-Carson announced they would hold a news conference Tuesday morning to outline their bill.

California lawmakers prepare to introduce gun bill modeled on Texas abortion law

Three Democratic California lawmakers announced Monday they plan to introduce a bill “to enable private citizens to hold firearms manufacturers and dealers liable for the harm their products cause.”

Assemblymembers Phil Ting, D-San Francisco, Chris Ward, D-San Diego, and Mike A. Gipson, D-Carson announced they would hold a news conference Tuesday morning to outline their bill.

This matches an idea floated by Gov. Gavin Newsom in the wake of a U.S. Supreme Court decision to allow a Texas law enabling private citizens to sue abortion providers to remain in effect while a court challenge plays out.

“If states can now shield their laws from review by the federal courts that compare assault weapons to Swiss Army knives, then California will use that authority to protect people’s lives, where Texas used it to put women in harm’s way,” Newsom said in a Dec. 11 news release. “I have directed my staff to work with the Legislature and the attorney general on a bill that would create a right of action allowing private citizens to seek injunctive relief, and statutory damages of at least $10,000 per violation plus costs and attorney’s fees, against anyone who manufactures, distributes, or sells an assault weapon or ghost gun kit or parts in the State of California. If the most efficient way to keep these devastating weapons off our streets is to add the threat of private lawsuits, we should do just that.”

— Malcolm Maclachlan

#365542

Malcolm Maclachlan

Daily Journal Staff Writer
malcolm_maclachlan@dailyjournal.com

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390

Send a letter to the editor:

Email: letters@dailyjournal.com