This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Letters

May 3, 2024

Depending on the facts, plaintiffs can argue for greater penalties under Section 226.3

The Gunther case expressly declined to follow an earlier decision in the Fourth District, Raines v. Coastal Pacific Food Distributors (2018) 23 Cal.App.5th 667, and this conflict has not been resolved.

On March 21, the Daily Journal published "Common Misconceptions about PAGA Penalties," by JJ Johnston.

I wanted to bring your attention to a mistake in the article. Regarding the availability of heightened civil penalties under Labor Code section 226.3, the Gunther case (Gunther v. Alaska Airlines, Inc. ((2021), 72 Cal.App.5th ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails