Whether a defendant asserting ineffective assistance that
results in a structural error must, in addition to demonstrating deficient performance, show
that he was prejudiced by counsel's ineffectiveness, as held by four circuits and five state
courts of last resort; or whether prejudice is presumed in such cases, as held by four other
circuits and two state high courts.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In