For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Administrative Agencies
Bookmark

Matal v. Tam

Ruling by

Samuel Anthony Alito Jr.

Lower Court

U.S. Court of Appeals for The Federal Circuit

concurring Judge(s)

Anthony M. Kennedy
Clarence Thomas
Even under looser commercial-speech test, Disparagement clause violates First Amendment Free Speech Clause because it is not narrowly drawn to serve substantial governmental interest.



To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails

Related Content

Corporate, Entertainment & Sports, Intellectual Property, Civil Litigation, Year in Review Column

Trademarks, free speech and cannabis

Dec. 20, 2017
By Jane Shay Wald

Appellate Practice, Constitutional Law, U.S. Supreme Court

First Amendment round up

Jul. 5, 2017
By Jean-Paul Jassy

Constitutional Law, U.S. Supreme Court

Giving offense is a viewpoint

Jun. 23, 2017
By Blaine H. Evanson, Christina R.B. Lopez

Constitutional Law, Intellectual Property, Civil Litigation

Is scandalous trademark bar unconstitutional, too?

Sep. 5, 2018
By Ned Snow

Intellectual Property, U.S. Supreme Court

High court strikes down patent office’s standard of ‘immoral’

Jun. 25, 2019
By Glenn Jeffers

9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, California Supreme Court, Constitutional Law, U.S. Supreme Court

The two imperatives of the First Amendment

Sep. 23, 2019
By Mitchell Keiter

Civil Litigation, Constitutional Law

Denial of ‘offensive’ license plates unconstitutional, judge rules

Nov. 27, 2020
By Winston Cho

Constitutional Law, Intellectual Property, U.S. Supreme Court

First Amendment and trademark registration: Vidal v. Elster argument preview

Oct. 30, 2023
By Conor Tucker

Intellectual Property, Technology, U.S. Supreme Court

Two upcoming shakeups in trade secret law

Dec. 8, 2023
By Thomas G. Sprankling
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.