This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

People v. Marsh

Ruling by

M. Kathleen Butz

Lower Court

Yolo County Superior Court

Lower Court Judge

David W. Reed
No constitutional rule exists requiring uniform sanity determination in state court, nor do constitutional protections against disproportionate punishments require a sanity determination evaluating whether defendant was compelled by irresistible impulse.



To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up