Ruling by
Clarence Thomas
Credit-card market properly viewed as one market seeking to provide 'transactions;' thus, plaintiff's attempt to showing that credit-card company's antisteering provisions restrain trade as to one piece of that market (i.e. to merchants) fails Sherman Act's 'rule of reason' test.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In