For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Constitutional Law
Bookmark

National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra

Ruling by

Clarence Thomas

dissenting Judge(s)

Stephen G. Breyer
California law requiring state-drafted notice be disseminated in licensed pregnancy centers fails intermediate scrutiny as 'wildly underinclusive' and not properly tailored.



To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails

Related Content

Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, U.S. Supreme Court

US Supreme Court rejects state law requiring abortion disclosure

Jun. 27, 2018
By Nicolas Sonnenburg

9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, U.S. Supreme Court

After NIFLA, we need a principle for disclosure laws

Jun. 28, 2018
By Erwin Chemerinsky

9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Constitutional Law, U.S. Supreme Court

9th Circuit must reconsider Berkeley commercial speech ordinance under new NIFLA precedent

Jun. 29, 2018
By Nicolas Sonnenburg

Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Health Care & Hospital Law, U.S. Supreme Court

NIFLA v Becerra: folly, fallout and follow-up

Jul. 3, 2018
By Devin W. Mauney, Sanford Jay Rosen

Constitutional Law, U.S. Supreme Court

Religious rulings under the new Gorsuch-Roberts court

Jul. 3, 2018
By Thomas M. Hall

Constitutional Law, U.S. Supreme Court

Kennedy's parting can(n)on of ferociously unregulated speech for pro-life pregnancy clinics

Jul. 6, 2018
By David Boyle

Constitutional Law, U.S. Supreme Court

What the high court said in OT ’17

MCLE
Jul. 6, 2018
By James Azadian, David Boyadzhyan

Administrative/Regulatory, U.S. Supreme Court

Is NIFLA the death knell for Prop 65 warnings?

Jul. 12, 2018
By Steven L. Crane, Steven L. Feldman

Judges and Judiciary, U.S. Supreme Court

Kennedy, Kavanaugh and the OT17 term

Jul. 12, 2018
By Blaine H. Evanson, Warren Loegering

9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Government

9th Circuit sits en banc to mull constitutionality of San Francisco soda health warning

Sep. 26, 2018
By Nicolas Sonnenburg

9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Constitutional Law, U.S. Supreme Court

Supreme Court adds to growing list of 9th Circuit reversals

Nov. 30, 2018
By Lawrence Waddington

Appellate Practice

Waking Dead Appeals

Jan. 2, 2019
By Benjamin G. Shatz

9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

En banc 9th Circuit unanimously blocks San Francisco soda ad label ordinance

Feb. 1, 2019
By Nicolas Sonnenburg

9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Constitutional Law

The Nascent, Nebulous NIFLA Doctrine

MCLE
Feb. 4, 2019
By Wencong Fa, Ted Mermin

9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Constitutional Law

Judges split on First Amendment scrutiny in sugar drink case

Feb. 13, 2019
By Amy P. Lally, Andrew B. Talai

9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, U.S. Supreme Court

After remand, divided 9th Circuit panel allows warning labels on cell phones in Berkeley

Jul. 3, 2019
By Brian Cardile

9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, California Supreme Court, Constitutional Law, U.S. Supreme Court

The two imperatives of the First Amendment

Sep. 23, 2019
By Mitchell Keiter

Judge Profile

Dec. 9, 2002

Clarence Thomas

Associate Justice

By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.