An "agricultural practice exception" set forth in 50 C.F.R. Section 20.21 (i) (1) applies to unlawful taking, not to unlawful baiting, so it was misapplied by a District Court when it convicted a farmer; but the error was harmless.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
