Doe v. Claremont McKenna College

Ruling by

Lower Court

Los Angeles County Superior Court

Lower Court Judge

Where campus disciplinary hearing depends on witness' credibility, and has potentially severe consequences, accused student entitled to question accuser (possibly indirectly through screen or via videoconference), in presence of fact-finder.

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Already a subscriber?
Sign In

Enewsletter Sign-up

Judge Profile

May 26, 2014

Helen I. Bendix

Associate Justice

Filter by date

Exact Phrase

Not the words

At least one of the words

All the words

Doe v. Claremont McKenna College

Ruling by

Lower Court

Lower Court Judge

Enewsletter Sign-up

Related Content

California Courts of Appeal, Constitutional Law, Civil Litigation, Education Law

Trilogy of cases leads the way on due process for students

9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Education Law

Title IX ruling is favorable authority for universities

9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Letters, Education Law

Universities cannot shortcut the due process rights of those accused of sexual misconduct

Education Law

Review new Title IX regulations, effective this month

Civil Rights, Education Law

Developments related to sexual misconduct on college campuses

California Supreme Court, Constitutional Law

Title IX: What the Boermeester v. Carry decision means for private universities

Judge Profile

Helen I. Bendix