Ruling by
Diarmuid F. O'ScannlainLower Court
USDC Northern District of CaliforniaLower Court Judge
William H. Orrick III
'Network Investigative Technique warrant' was not considered a tracking device permitted by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure Rule 41(b)(4) because it did not physically 'track movement of person or property.'
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
