Jury instruction that defendant could not be liable if it terminated plaintiff due to 'honest belief' that he violated safety rules in retaliation claim was inconsistent with Federal Railroad Safety Act's statutory mandate.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Labor/Employment, U.S. Supreme Court
SCOTUS poised to resolve circuit split on SOX federal whistleblower standard and other statutes
Aug. 28, 2023
