Ruling by
M. Margaret McKeownLower Court
USDC Northern District of CaliforniaLower Court Judge
Jon S. Tigar
Telephone Consumer Protection Act's exception for calls 'made solely to collect a debt owed to or guaranteed by the United States' was content-based and violated First Amendment; thus, exception severed.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Facebook may be liable for errant account security alerts, 9th Circuit rules
Jun. 14, 2019
By Brian Cardile
By Brian Cardile
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Civil Litigation
Is TCPA doomed?
Aug. 23, 2019
By A. Paul Heeringa
By A. Paul Heeringa
Civil Litigation, U.S. Supreme Court
Supreme Court to decide fate of TCPA autodialer rules
Oct. 7, 2020
By Artin Betpera, Nikku Khalifian
By Artin Betpera, Nikku Khalifian
