Ruling by
Harry E. Hull Jr.Lower Court
Sacramento County Superior CourtLower Court Judge
Jack Sapunor
Electronic device search probation condition imposed upon defendant who committed identity theft crime was reasonably related to preventing future criminality and did not violate defendant's Fourth Amendment right to privacy.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
