Ruling by
J. Clifford WallaceLower Court
USDC Northern District of CaliforniaLower Court Judge
William H. Orrick III
Where an ERISA plan administrator's interpretation of what type of work falls within the plan's definition of 'prohibited employment' is strictly complied with, there is no abuse of discretion.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In