Ruling by
Tani Cantil-SakauyeLower Court
9th U.S. Circuit Court of AppealsAn employer's level of control over employees, not the mandatory nature of employees' activity, determines whether 'hours worked' are compensable under Wage Order 7.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
California Supreme Court, Labor/Employment
State high court says employers must pay for employee bag searches
Feb. 14, 2020
By Meghann Cuniff
By Meghann Cuniff
California Supreme Court, Civil Litigation, Labor/Employment
Employers pay when employees bring their baggage to work
Feb. 19, 2020
By Steven B. Katz, Christin Lawler
By Steven B. Katz, Christin Lawler
California Supreme Court, Civil Litigation, Labor/Employment
After ruling, employers should reexamine security procedures
Mar. 30, 2020
By Elizabeth Arnold
By Elizabeth Arnold
California Supreme Court, Labor/Employment
Where will the next California Supreme Court decision on state minimum wage laws come from?
Apr. 29, 2020
By Gregg Adam
By Gregg Adam
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Labor/Employment
Tweak in ruling on worker searches may have big impact for Apple
Nov. 2, 2020
By Craig Anderson
By Craig Anderson
