Ruling by
Ruth Bader GinsburgLower Court
9th U.S. Circuit Court of AppealsLower Court Judge
A. Wallace Tashima
Ninth Circuit abused its discretion when it took over the appeal and decided that 8 U.S.C. Section 1324(a) was unconstitutionally overbroad even though contrary theory was presented.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Immigration, U.S. Supreme Court
Ginsburg smacks 9th Circuit, backed by unanimous high court
May 8, 2020
By Tyler Pialet
By Tyler Pialet
