Ruling by
Michael J. RaphaelLower Court
Riverside County Superior CourtLower Court Judge
David M. Chapman
Defendants' conduct arose from protected activity because their allegedly defamatory statements were made in connection with issue of public interest; thus, anti-SLAPP motion should have been granted.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In