Ruling by
Richard A. PaezLower Court
USDC Northern District of CaliforniaLower Court Judge
Maxine M. Chesney
Under reasonable consumer test, plaintiffs sufficiently alleged that sale of prescription pet food exclusively through vets or with veterinarian approval was a deceptive practice.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In