Ruling by
Danny BoggsLower Court
USDC Central District of CaliforniaLower Court Judge
Stephen V. Wilson
Plaintiffs did not need to allege supplemental jurisdiction for their state-law claims under CAFA since they had already alleged original jurisdiction over entire action.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In