Ruling by
Mark J. BennettLower Court
USDC Eastern District of CaliforniaLower Court Judge
Kimberly J. MuellerGiven the robust disagreement by scientific sources over whether acrylamide in food causes cancer, the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding a Proposition 65 warning controversial.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
State can’t require warning on acrylamide, circuit ruled
Mar. 18, 2022
By Malcolm Maclachlan
By Malcolm Maclachlan
