Ruling by
Elena KaganLower Court
9th U.S. Circuit Court of AppealsLower Court Judge
Andrew D. Hurwitz
While dog toy company used Jack Daniel's trademarked bottle design and logo in a humorous way, their chew toy was not an "expressive work" that avoided analysis of consumer confusion.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In