Ruling by
Per CuriamLower Court
USDC Central District of CaliforniaLower Court Judge
David O. Carter
Defendants' argument, that they were deprived of notice before Los Angeles City seized their personal and business bank funds to satisfy a judgment, failed because there was minimal risk of erroneous deprivation.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In