This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Williams v. Superior Court (Marshalls of CA LLC)

Ruling by

Victoria G. Chaney

Lower Court

Los Angeles County Superior Court

Lower Court Judge

William F. Highberger
Order


Court

California Courts of Appeal 2DCA/1

Published

Nov. 17, 2017

Filing Date

Nov. 15, 2017

Opinion Type

Order

Disposition Type

Petition Granted


MICHAEL WILLIAMS,

Petitioner,

v.

SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY,

Respondent;

 

MARSHALLS OF CA, LLC,

Real Party in Interest.

 

No. B259967

(Los Angeles County

Super. Ct. No. BC503806)

California Courts of Appeal

Second Appellate District

Division One

Filed November 15, 2017

 

Petition for extraordinary writ. William F. Highberger, Judge. Petition is granted.

Capstone Law, Glenn A. Danas, Robert Drexler, Stan Karas, Liana Carter for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Littler Mendelson, Robert G. Hulteng, Joshua J. Cliffe, Emily E. O'Connor, Scott D. Helsinger for Real Party in Interest.

 

In these proceedings, plaintiff Michael Williams petitions for a writ of mandate compelling the superior court to vacate its limited discovery order entered September 9, 2014, and enter a new order granting the motion and ordering real party in interest to produce a list of the names and contact information of its non-exempt California employees employed since March 22, 2012. The case is before us on remand from the California Supreme Court following reversal of our previous decision denying the petition. (Williams v. Superior Court (2017) 3 Cal.5th 531.)

Pursuant to the Supreme Court's direction, we vacate our earlier decision and grant the petition.

 

DISPOSITION

 

Our previous opinion in this case, filed on May 15, 2015, is vacated. The petition is granted. The trial court is directed to vacate its limited discovery order and enter a new order granting discovery of the names and contact information of real party in interest's non-exempt California employees employed since March 22, 2012.

Petitioner shall receive his costs on appeal.

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

 

 

CHANEY, J.

 

We concur:

ROTHSCHILD, P. J.

JOHNSON, J.

#270373

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424