Ruling by
John L. SegalLower Court
Los Angeles County Superior CourtLower Court Judge
Hector M. Guzman
Though court noted it would likely not have stayed mandatory firearm enhancement even if it had discretion to do so, remand necessary for reconsideration after statutory amendments grant such discretion.
Court
California Courts of Appeal 2DCA/7Cite as
2018 DJDAR 4274Published
May 10, 2018Filing Date
May 8, 2018Opinion Type
ModificationDisposition Type
RemandedTHE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
JOSEPH L. BILLINGSLEY,
Defendant and Appellant.
No. B279929
(Los Angeles County
Super. Ct. No. YA091690)
California Courts of Appeal
Second Appellate District
Division Seven
Filed May 8, 2018
The opinion filed on May 2, 2018, and partially certified for publication, is modified as follows:
On page 25, footnote 8 is deleted. There are no subsequent footnotes.
This order does not change the judgment.
SEGAL, J.
We concur:
PERLUSS, P. J.
ZELON, J.
#271246
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390