Ruling by
Leondra R. KrugerLower Court
Sacramento County Superior CourtLower Court Judge
Goodwin H. LiuCourt
CASCCite as
2018 DJDAR 8220Published
Aug. 17, 2018Filing Date
Aug. 15, 2018Opinion Type
ModificationDisposition Type
Affirmed as Modified
v.
No. S057156
Sacramento County
Super. Ct. No. 93F05175
California Supreme Court
Filed Aug. 15, 2018
ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND
DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING
THE COURT:
The opinion in this matter filed May 31, 2018, and appearing at 5 Cal.5th 1, is modified as follows:
The final sentence at the end of the first paragraph on page 45 --- which currently states, "In any event, the argument fails on its merits." --- is deleted. The following sentence is inserted to start the subsequent paragraph on page 45:
To the extent defendant raises a challenge on an issue other than credibility, the argument fails on its merits.
In the last sentence of the first full paragraph on page 45, the word "convincingly" is inserted between the words "not" and "explain." The sentence now reads:
Defendant says that "[d]emonstrating that Reed did not know about the inconsistencies between Langford's and Webster's testimony was important to appellant's defense that Webster framed appellant," but does not convincingly explain why that is so.
The modification does not affect the judgment.
The petition for rehearing is denied.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390